Abstract:
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are being selected for venous access more frequently today than ever before. Often the choice of a PICC, when compared with other vascular access devices (VADs), is attractive because of perceived safety, availability, and ease of insertion. However, complications associated with PICCs exist, and there is a paucity of evidence to guide clinician choice for PICC selection and valid use.
[ctt tweet=”ReTweet if useful… Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) http://ctt.ec/cU44U+ @ivteam #ivteam” coverup=”cU44U”]
An international panel with expertise in the arena of venous access and populations associated with these devices was convened to clarify approaches for the optimal use of PICCs and VADs. Here we present for the busy hospital-based practitioner the methodology, key outcomes, and recommendations of the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) panelists for the appropriate use of VADs.
Reference:
Woller, S.C., Stevens, S.M. and Evans, R.S. (2015) The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) initiative: A summary and review of peripherally inserted central catheter and venous catheter appropriate use. Journal of Hospital Medicine. December 14th. [epub ahead of print].
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2525.
Thank you to our partners for supporting IVTEAM
[slideshow_deploy id=’23788’]