Search
"The preferred site for insertion was the dorsum of the hand and forearm (58.8%). 22.6% did not report a visual infusion phlebitis score at least daily, and 48% did not document a daily dressing assessment" Hoskins et al (2022).
Peripheral IV catheter care

Abstract:

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical practice about peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion, maintenance and removal in a cohort of Victorian hospitals.

Design: A standardized PIVC audit tool was developed, and results from point prevalent surveys were conducted.

Methods: Hospitalized patients requiring a PIVC insertion were eligible for audit. Audit data submitted between 2015 and 2019 were extracted for the current study.

Results: 3566 PIVC insertions in 15 Victorian public hospitals were evaluated. 57.6% of PIVCs were inserted in wards, 18.7% in operating theatres and 11.6% in Emergency Departments (ED). 45.2% were inserted by nurses and 38.2% by medical staff. The preferred site for insertion was the dorsum of the hand and forearm (58.8%). 22.6% did not report a visual infusion phlebitis score at least daily, and 48% did not document a daily dressing assessment. Reasons for PIVC removal included no longer required (63%) and phlebitis (4.8%). No bloodstream infections were reported.

Reference:

Hoskins A, Worth LJ, Malloy MJ, Smith M, Atkins S, Bennett N. Evaluating peripheral intravascular catheter insertion, maintenance and removal practices in small hospitals using a standardized audit tool. Nurs Open. 2022 Mar 11. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1176. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35274830.