Appropriateness of PICC use among general medical inpatients

Haddad, A., Elgemmezi, T., Chaїb, M., Bou Assi, T., Abu Helu, R., Hmida, S., Benajiba, M., Ba, K., Alqudah, M., Abi Hanna, P., Najjar, O. and Garraud, O. (2020) Quality and safety measures in transfusion practice: The experience of eight southern/eastern Mediterranean countries. Vox Sanguinis. March 2nd. doi: 10.1111/vox.12903. (Epub ahead of print).

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are among the most commonly used medical devices in hospital. This study sought to determine the appropriateness of inpatient PICC use in general medicine at five academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, based on the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC).

METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of general internal medicine patients discharged between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2015 who received a PICC during hospitalisation. The primary outcomes were the proportions of appropriate and inappropriate inpatient PICC use based on MAGIC recommendations. Hospital administrative data and electronic clinical data were used to determine appropriateness of each PICC placement. Multivariable regression models were fit to explore patient predictors of inappropriate use.

RESULTS: Among 3479 PICC placements, 1848 (53%, 95% CI 51% to 55%) were appropriate, 573 (16%, 95% CI 15% to 18%) were inappropriate and 1058 (30%, 95% CI 29% to 32%) were of uncertain appropriateness. The proportion of appropriate and inappropriate PICCs ranged from 44% to 61% (p<0.001) and 13% to 21% (p<0.001) across hospitals, respectively. The most common reasons for inappropriate PICC use were placement in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (n=500, 14%) and use for fewer than 15 days in patients who are critically ill (n=53), which represented 14% of all PICC placements in the intensive care unit. Patients who were older, female, had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 0 and more severe illness based on the Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score were more likely to receive an inappropriate PICC.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice recommendations can be operationalised into measurable domains to estimate the appropriateness of PICC insertions using routinely collected hospital data. Inappropriate PICC use was common and varied substantially across hospitals in this study, suggesting that there are important opportunities to improve care.


Verma, A.A., Kumachev, A., Shah, S., Guo, Y., Jung, H.Y., Rawal, S., Lapointe-Shaw, L., Kwan, J.L., Weinerman, A., Tang, T. and Razak, F. (2020) Appropriateness of peripherally inserted central catheter use among general medical inpatients: an observational study using routinely collected data. BMJ Quality & Safety. March 8th. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010463. (Epub ahead of print).

Safety IV catheter