Taurolidine-Citrate catheter lock

0

Intravenous literature: Solomon, L.R., Cheesbrough, J.S., Ebah, L., Al-Sayed, T., Heap, M., Millband, N., Waterhouse, D., Mitra, S., Curry, A., Saxena, R., Bhat, R., Schulz, M. and Diggle, P. (2010) A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Taurolidine-Citrate Catheter Locks for the Prevention of Bacteremia in Patients Treated With Hemodialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity in patients using intravascular catheters. Interdialytic locking with antibiotics decreases the incidence of bacteremia, but risks antibiotic resistance. Taurolidine is a nontoxic broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that has not been associated with resistance. Preliminary evidence suggests that taurolidine-citrate locks decrease bacteremia, but cause flow problems in established catheters.

STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

INTERVENTION: Interdialytic locking with taurolidine and citrate (1.35% taurolidine and 4% citrate) compared with heparin (5,000 U/mL) started at catheter insertion.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 110 adult hemodialysis patients with tunneled cuffed intravascular catheters inserted at 3 centers in Northwest England.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were time to first bacteremia episode from any cause and time to first use of thrombolytic therapy.

RESULTS: There were 11 bacteremic episodes in the taurolidine-citrate group and 23 in the heparin group (1.4 and 2.4 episodes/1,000 patient-days, respectively; P = 0.1). There was no significant benefit of taurolidine-citrate versus heparin for time to first bacteremia (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.2-1.6: P = 0.4). Taurolidine-citrate was associated with fewer infections caused by Gram-negative organisms than heparin (0.2 vs 1.1 infections/1,000 patient-days; P = 0.02); however, there was no difference for Gram-positive organisms (1.1 vs 1.2 infections/1,000 patient-days; P = 0.8). There was a greater need for thrombolytic therapy in the taurolidine-citrate versus heparin group (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.2; P = 0.008).

LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. The study included bacteremia from all causes and was not specific for catheter-related bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine-citrate use did not decrease all-cause bacteremia and was associated with a greater need for thrombolytic treatment. There was a decrease in infections caused by Gram-negative organisms and a trend to a lower frequency of bacteremia, which warrants further study.


Share.

Comments are closed.

Free Email Updates
Join 5.5K IVTEAM members. Subscribe now and be the first to receive all the latest free updates from IVTEAM!
100% Privacy. We don't spam.