“The aim of this study was to compare clinical aspects of the application of three-in-one total nutrient mixture (TNA) for peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) with those of the conventional PPN (cPPN) method of providing short-term parenteral nutrition for pediatric inpatients” Yi and Yang (2015).
Reference:
Yi, D.Y. and Yang, H.R. (2015) Comparison of a three-in-one total nutrient mixture with conventional peripheral parenteral nutrition in children. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 24(1), p.44-50.
[ctt tweet=”Comparison of different peripheral parenteral nutrition formulations http://ctt.ec/JXAy6+ @ivteam #ivteam” coverup=”JXAy6″]
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare clinical aspects of the application of three-in-one total nutrient mixture (TNA) for peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) with those of the conventional PPN (cPPN) method of providing short-term parenteral nutrition for pediatric inpatients.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in children from 2 to 18 years old who were hospitalized and underwent PPN administration. We compared clinical aspects of two methods of PPN, cPPN (n=39) and TNA (n=57).
RESULTS: The mean age was 6.5±3.1 years in the cPPN group and 8.2±3.4years in the TNA group (p=0.015). In the TNA group, there was a significantly shorter period between the day of admission and the first day of PPN or oral feeding (p
CONCLUSIONS: When providing nutrients to hospitalized children who cannot take in enough nutrients via the enteral route, TNA formula may be an easier and faster method than cPPN.
Thank you to our partners for supporting IVTEAM
[slideshow_deploy id=’23788’]