To evaluate feasibility of an efficacy trial comparing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing and securement techniques to prevent complications and failure” Kleidon et al (2017).
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility of an efficacy trial comparing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing and securement techniques to prevent complications and failure.
[ctt link=”774Z5″ template=”1″]ReTweet if useful… Novel IV dressing and securement techniques in pediatric patients https://ctt.ec/774Z5+ @ivteam #ivteam[/ctt]
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pilot, 3-armed, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at Royal Children’s Hospital and Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, between April 2014 and September 2015. Pediatric participants (N = 101; age range, 0-18 y) were assigned to standard care (bordered polyurethane [BPU] dressing, sutureless securement device), tissue adhesive (TA) (plus BPU dressing), or integrated securement dressings (ISDs). Average PICC dwell time was 8.1 days (range, 0.2-27.7 d). Primary outcome was trial feasibility including PICC failure. Secondary outcomes were PICC complications, dressing performance, and parent and staff satisfaction.
RESULTS: Protocol feasibility was established. PICC failure was 6% (2/32) with standard care, 6% (2/31) with ISD, and 3% (1/32) with TA. PICC complications were 16% across all groups. TA provided immediate postoperative hemostasis, prolonging the first dressing change until 5.5 days compared with 3.5 days and 2.5 days with standard care and ISD respectively. Bleeding was the most common reason for first dressing change: standard care (n = 18; 75%), ISD (n = 11; 69%), TA (n = 4; 27%). Parental satisfaction (median 9.7/10; P = .006) and staff feedback (9.2/10; P = .002) were most positive for ISD.
CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests safety and acceptability of different securement dressings compared with standard care; securement dressings may also reduce dressing changes after insertion. Further research is required to confirm clinically cost-effective methods to prevent PICC failure.
Reference:
Kleidon, T.M., Ullman, A.J., Gibson, V., Chaseling, B., Schoutrop, J., Mihalia, G. and Rickard, C.M. (2017) A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Dressing and Securement Techniques in 101 Pediatric Patients. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. September 8th. [Epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.012.
Thank you to our partners for supporting IVTEAM
[slideshow_deploy id=’23788’]