Search

The current methodology for calculating central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates, used for pay-for-performance measures, does not account for multiple concurrent central lines” Couk et al (2019).

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The current methodology for calculating central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates, used for pay-for-performance measures, does not account for multiple concurrent central lines.

OBJECTIVE: To compare CLABSI rates using standard National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) denominators to rates accounting for multiple concurrent central lines.

DESIGN: Descriptive analysis and retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS: We identified all adult patients with central lines at 2 academic medical centers over an 18-month period. CLABSI rates were calculated for intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICUs using the standard NHSN methodology and denominator (a patient could only have 1 central-line day for a given patient day) and a modified denominator (number of central lines in 1 patient in 1 day count as number of line days). We also compared characteristics of patients with and without multiple concurrent central lines.

RESULTS: Among 18,521 hospital admissions, there were 156,574 central-line days and 239 CLABSIs (ICU, 105; non-ICU, 134). Our modified denominator reduced CLABSI rates by 25% in ICUs (1.95 vs 1.47 per 1,000 line days) and 6% (1.30 vs 1.22 per 1,000 line days) in non-ICUs. Patients with multiple concurrent central lines were more likely to be in an ICU, to have a longer admission, to have a dialysis catheter, and to have a CLABSI.

CONCLUSIONS: Using the number of central lines as the denominator decreased CLABSI rates in ICUs by 25%. The presence of multiple concurrent central lines may be a marker of severity of illness. The risk of CLABSI per lumen of a central line is similar in ICUs compared to wards.

You may also be interested in…

[rp4wp]
[button link=”https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E2C192B5BA03998AD95DC10FA18C82E7/S0899823X19001806a.pdf/impact_of_multiple_concurrent_central_lines_on_centrallineassociated_bloodstream_infection_rates.pdf” color=”default”]Full Text[/button]
[spacer height=”20px”]



Reference:

Couk, J., Chernetsky Tejedor, S., Steinberg, J.P., Robichaux, C. and Jacob, J.T. (2019) Impact of multiple concurrent central lines on central-line-associated bloodstream infection rates. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. July 24th. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.180. [Epub ahead of print].