Product characteristics of safety-engineered winged blood collection needles

0

To evaluate differences in product characteristics and user preferences of safety-engineered protection mechanisms of winged blood collection needles” Haupt et al (2016).

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in product characteristics and user preferences of safety-engineered protection mechanisms of winged blood collection needles.

DESIGN Randomized model-based simulation study.

SETTING: University medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 33 third-year medical students.

METHODS: Venipuncture was performed using winged blood collection needles with 4 different safety mechanisms: (a) Venofix Safety, (b) BD Vacutainer Push Button, (c) Safety-Multifly, and (d) Surshield Surflo. Each needle type was used in 3 consecutive tries: there was an uninstructed first handling, then instructions were given according to the operating manual; subsequently, a first trial and second trial were conducted. Study end points included successful activation, activation time, single-handed activation, correct activation, possible risk of needlestick injury, possibility of deactivation, and preferred safety mechanism.

RESULTS: The overall successful activation rate during the second trial was equal for all 4 devices (94%-100%). Median activation time was (a) 7 s, (b) 2 s, (c) 9 s, and (d) 7 s. Single-handed activation during the second trial was (a) 18%, (b) 82%, (c) 15%, and (d) 45%. Correct activation during the second trial was (a) 3%, (b) 64%, (c) 15%, and (d) 39%. Possible risk of needlestick injury during the second trial was highest with (d). Possibility of deactivation was (a) 0%, (b) 12%, (c) 9%, and (d) 18%. Individual preferences for each system were (a) 11, (b) 17, (c) 5, and (d) 0. The main reason for preference was the comprehensive safety mechanism.

CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist between safety mechanisms of winged blood collection needles.

Reference:

Haupt, C., Spaeth, J., Ahne, T., Goebel, U. and Steinmann, D. (2016) A Model-Based Product Evaluation Protocol for Comparison of Safety-Engineered Protection Mechanisms of Winged Blood Collection Needles. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. February 12th. [Epub ahead of print].

Thank you to our partners for supporting IVTEAM

Share.

Comments are closed.

Free Email Updates
Join 5.5K IVTEAM members. Subscribe now and be the first to receive all the latest free updates from IVTEAM!
100% Privacy. We don't spam.