“In neonates requiring long-term central access, does removal of the umbilical venous catheter (UVC) on days 5-7 and replacement with a peripherally inserted central catheter line compared with leaving the UVC in situ reduce rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections?” Keir et al (2014).
Reference:
Keir, A., Giesinger, R. and Dunn, M. (2014) How long should umbilical venous catheters remain in place in neonates who require long-term (≥5-7 days) central venous access? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 50(8), p.649-52.
[ctt tweet=”How long should umbilical venous catheters remain in place in neonates http://ctt.ec/VdtdF+ @ivteam #ivteam” coverup=”VdtdF”]
Abstract:
In this evidenced-based review, we examine the current available literature to help answer the question ‘In neonates requiring long-term central access [patient], does removal of the umbilical venous catheter (UVC) on days 5-7 and replacement with a peripherally inserted central catheter line [intervention] compared with leaving the UVC in situ [comparison] reduce rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections [outcome]?’
Other intravenous and vascular access resources that may be of interest (External links – IVTEAM has no responsibility for content).
- Guide for intravenous chemotherapy and associated vascular access devices from Macmillan.
- CancerUK IV chemotherapy information.
