Comparison of standard short peripheral catheters versus a power injectable version

0

…compared the use and outcomes of standard SPCs (nonfenestrated) versus a power injectable SPC (fenestrated with 3 side holes distal to the catheter tip)” Pohlod (2018).

Abstract:

To perform high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging angiographies, contrast typically is rapidly injected through a 20-gauge or larger short peripheral catheter (SPC). Intravenous access in infants and children can be challenging, and the use of large-gauge catheters is not always feasible. An institutional review board-approved quality improvement study was undertaken at a 250-bed pediatric hospital on Florida’s Gulf Coast that compared the use and outcomes of standard SPCs (nonfenestrated) versus a power injectable SPC (fenestrated with 3 side holes distal to the catheter tip).

You may also be interested in…





Reference:

Pohlod, V. (2018) Standard Short Peripheral Catheters (SPCs) Versus Power Injectable SPCs During Contrast Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Angiography: A Quality Improvement Study. Journal of Infusion Nursing. 41(6), p.358-364.

doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000301.

Share.

Comments are closed.